TopEmpresa
Best real estate consultancies
An evidence-led comparison with a defined scope, public sources and explicit limitations.
Direct answer
This ranking compares providers against one defined business requirement. Use the position as a starting point and validate the assigned team, relevant evidence, scope, cost, support and limitations before contracting.
Shortlist comparison
| Position | Company | Best for | Typical client | What to validate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CBRE | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 2 | JLL | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 3 | Savills | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 4 | Cushman & Wakefield | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 5 | Knight Frank | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 6 | Colliers | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
Companies in the current selection
Position 1 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
CBRE
CBRE is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 2 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
JLL
JLL is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 3 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Savills
Savills is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 4 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Cushman & Wakefield
Cushman & Wakefield is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 5 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Knight Frank
Knight Frank is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 6 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Colliers
Colliers is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Method and limitations
- Match with the exact service, migration route or Microsoft workload in the page.
- Coverage of identity, mail, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, endpoint, security and Azure where relevant.
- Assessment, architecture, pilot, pre-stage, deltas, cutover, rollback, validation and stabilisation.
- Published cases with enough context, scale, workloads, delivery detail and outcome.
- Privileged-access security, traceability, data protection, change control and access offboarding.
- Capacity for SMEs, mid-market, enterprise, groups, subsidiaries and international programmes.
- Deliverables, acceptance, knowledge transfer, support, licences, third parties and exit.
- Direct correspondence between material claims and current public sources.
Frequently asked questions
How should this ranking be interpreted?
It is a reasoned shortlist for the stated requirement. First position indicates the strongest fit with the published criteria, not a guarantee for every organisation or project.