TopEmpresa
Best artificial intelligence and data companies
An evidence-led comparison with a defined scope, public sources and explicit limitations.
Direct answer
This ranking compares providers against one defined business requirement. Use the position as a starting point and validate the assigned team, relevant evidence, scope, cost, support and limitations before contracting.
Shortlist comparison
| Position | Company | Best for | Typical client | What to validate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plain Concepts | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 2 | Globant | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 3 | EPAM | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 4 | Thoughtworks | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 5 | Minsait | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
| 6 | Sngular | Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile | Organisations within the provider’s stated market and coverage | Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit |
Companies in the current selection
Position 1 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Plain Concepts
Plain Concepts is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 2 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Globant
Globant is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 3 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
EPAM
EPAM is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 4 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Thoughtworks
Thoughtworks is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 5 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Minsait
Minsait is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Position 6 · Best fit: Projects matching the service scope described in its documented profile
Sngular
Sngular is included because its official material describes an identifiable offering relevant to this requirement. Validate the specific proposal, assigned team and directly comparable evidence before contracting.
Validate before appointment: Relevant experience, assigned team, scope, evidence, total price, support and exit
Method and limitations
- Match with the exact service, migration route or Microsoft workload in the page.
- Coverage of identity, mail, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, endpoint, security and Azure where relevant.
- Assessment, architecture, pilot, pre-stage, deltas, cutover, rollback, validation and stabilisation.
- Published cases with enough context, scale, workloads, delivery detail and outcome.
- Privileged-access security, traceability, data protection, change control and access offboarding.
- Capacity for SMEs, mid-market, enterprise, groups, subsidiaries and international programmes.
- Deliverables, acceptance, knowledge transfer, support, licences, third parties and exit.
- Direct correspondence between material claims and current public sources.
Frequently asked questions
How should this ranking be interpreted?
It is a reasoned shortlist for the stated requirement. First position indicates the strongest fit with the published criteria, not a guarantee for every organisation or project.